1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1988 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 1988 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1988 Volkswagen Polo. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1988 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 346 kg more than 1988 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Ford Mustang 1988 Volkswagen Polo
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Mustang Polo
Year Released 1965 1988
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4261 cc 1043 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 163 HP 44 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1116 kg 770 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2340 mm