1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR-15
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 (450 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 66 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJR-15.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1992 Jaguar XJR-15 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Mustang | XJR-15 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 5993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 450 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2870 mm |