1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 354 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mustang | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2730 mm |
