1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 1992 Rover 620i is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1992 Rover 620i. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 620i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 620i weights approximately 139 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 620i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1992 Rover 620i | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Mustang | 620i |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
