1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (119 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Suzuki Baleno weights approximately 110 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | Baleno |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |
