1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1997 Ford Windstar is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Windstar weights approximately 574 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1997 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Windstar |
Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1920 mm |