1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 325 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Mustang | Smart |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
