1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 Renault Clio

To start off, 1997 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1997 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 120 kg more than 1997 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Ford Mustang 1997 Renault Clio
Make Ford Renault
Model Mustang Clio
Year Released 1965 1997
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 1170 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 975 kg 855 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 3710 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2550 mm