1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1999 Ford Windstar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1999 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Windstar.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 1999 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Windstar |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3066 mm |