1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Mustang | SS |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
