1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 MCC Smart
To start off, 2001 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 MCC Smart. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 255 kg more than 2001 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2001 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Mustang | Smart |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 2600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1820 mm |