1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz G. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 21 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2002 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Mustang | G |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2860 mm |