1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2002 Toyota Pod is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Pod (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 176 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2002 Toyota Pod | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Pod |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |