1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2003 Toyota Echo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Echo. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Echo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Toyota Echo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2003 Toyota Echo | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Echo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |