1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |