1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 945 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |