1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 721 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Ford | Westfield |
Model | Mustang | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 4733 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |