1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1064 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | XC90 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2433 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2720 mm |