1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4733 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |
