1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 39 kg more than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Because 2008 Nissan Livina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | Livina |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1077 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
