1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 9 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2009 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | E-150 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |