1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Mustang | RS3 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 335 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |