1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Honda Fit

To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Fit (115 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Fit weights approximately 170 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Ford Mustang 2013 Honda Fit
Make Ford Honda
Model Mustang Fit
Year Released 1965 2013
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 1497 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 975 kg 1145 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4105 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1695 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1525 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2500 mm