1965 Ford Zephyr vs. 2001 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2001 SsangYong Musso is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2001 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1965 Ford Zephyr. (72 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Zephyr.
Because 2001 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Zephyr. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 SsangYong Musso (318 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Zephyr. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Zephyr | 2001 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | Zephyr | Musso |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1703 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 22.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |