1965 Ford Zodiac vs. 1958 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1965 Ford Zodiac is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1958 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1958 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 345 kg more than 1958 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Zodiac | 1958 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Zodiac | TR3 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 29 L |