1965 Ford Zodiac vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 1977 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 90 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 1965 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Zodiac | 1977 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Zodiac | Omega |
Year Released | 1965 | 1977 |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2670 mm |