1965 Ford Zodiac vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1982 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Zodiac (108 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 270 kg more than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Ford Zodiac (190 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1965 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Ford Zodiac 1982 Nissan Bluebird
Make Ford Nissan
Model Zodiac Bluebird
Year Released 1965 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2553 cc 1595 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 81 HP
Torque 190 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 1000 kg
Vehicle Length 4650 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2530 mm