1965 Ford Zodiac vs. 2004 Nissan Xterra
To start off, 2004 Nissan Xterra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Xterra (138 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Xterra should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Xterra weights approximately 358 kg more than 1965 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Xterra (209 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Xterra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Zodiac | 2004 Nissan Xterra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Zodiac | Xterra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1628 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 73 L |