1965 Ford Zodiac vs. 2004 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2004 Saab 9-7X is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Saab 9-7X (272 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saab 9-7X should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2004 Saab 9-7X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Saab 9-7X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saab 9-7X (372 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (190 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Saab 9-7X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Zodiac. 2004 Saab 9-7X has automatic transmission and 1965 Ford Zodiac has manual transmission. 1965 Ford Zodiac will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Saab 9-7X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Zodiac | 2004 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Zodiac | 9-7X |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 372 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2880 mm |