1965 Ford Zodiac vs. 2012 Volkswagen up
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen up is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 341 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen up.
Because 1965 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen up, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Zodiac | 2012 Volkswagen up | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Zodiac | up |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 60 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2420 mm |