1965 Holden EH vs. 1967 Opel Record
To start off, 1967 Opel Record is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Record. (152 Nm). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Record.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Holden EH | 1967 Opel Record | |
| Make | Holden | Opel |
| Model | EH | Record |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2511 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 238 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |
