1965 Holden EH vs. 1968 MG MGC
To start off, 1968 MG MGC is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG MGC. 1965 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1968 MG MGC has manual transmission. 1968 MG MGC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1968 MG MGC | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | EH | MGC |
Year Released | 1965 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |