1965 Holden EH vs. 1970 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1970 Nissan Cedric is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 105 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1970 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | EH | Cedric |
Year Released | 1965 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |