1965 Holden EH vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1980 Volvo 66 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden EH weights approximately 363 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1980 Volvo 66 has manual transmission. 1980 Volvo 66 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | EH | 66 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |