1965 Holden EH vs. 1982 GMC Jimmy
To start off, 1982 GMC Jimmy is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1982 GMC Jimmy. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1982 GMC Jimmy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 315 kg more than 1965 Holden EH.
Because 1982 GMC Jimmy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 GMC Jimmy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 GMC Jimmy. (130 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 GMC Jimmy.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1982 GMC Jimmy | |
Make | Holden | GMC |
Model | EH | Jimmy |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2238 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |