1965 Holden EH vs. 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,955 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser (154 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 715 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser (300 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Holden EH. (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EH | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2740 mm |