1965 Holden EH vs. 1988 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1988 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden EH weights approximately 10 kg more than 1988 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1988 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Holden | Plymouth |
Model | EH | Sundance |
Year Released | 1965 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |