1965 Holden EH vs. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC
To start off, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,962 cc, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC weights approximately 865 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1994 Mercedes-Benz MCC | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | EH | MCC |
Year Released | 1965 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2962 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 2050 kg |