1965 Holden EH vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 645 kg more than 1965 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Holden EH | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | EH | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
