1965 Holden EH vs. 2001 Suzuki EV Sport
To start off, 2001 Suzuki EV Sport is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Suzuki EV Sport (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki EV Sport should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Suzuki EV Sport weights approximately 260 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport. (106 Nm). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki EV Sport.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 2001 Suzuki EV Sport | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | EH | EV Sport |
Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 398 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |