1965 Holden EH vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden EH weights approximately 485 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Holden EH | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EH | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |
