1965 Holden EH vs. 2007 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2007 Kia Sedona is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Sedona (244 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Sedona (343 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Holden EH. (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 2007 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Holden | Kia |
Model | EH | Sedona |
Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3030 mm |