1965 Holden EH vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. In terms of performance, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
Make | Holden | Smart |
Model | EH | Ultimate 112 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |