1965 Holden EH vs. 2009 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden EH (238 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Saab 03-Sep. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1965 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 2009 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Holden | Saab |
Model | EH | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 238 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |