1965 Holden EH vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero

To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1169 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero weights approximately 65 kg more than 1965 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero has manual transmission. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: