1965 Holden EH vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1965 Holden EH. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EH.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Holden EH | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Holden | Peugeot |
| Model | EH | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1359 mm |
