1965 Holden EK vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,248 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (240 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1965 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EK | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | EK | XJ |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |