1965 Holden EK vs. 2002 Kia Shuma
To start off, 2002 Kia Shuma is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Kia Shuma (100 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1965 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Kia Shuma should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Holden EK | 2002 Kia Shuma | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | EK | Shuma |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
