1965 Holden FB Special vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (102 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1965 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden FB Special weights approximately 2 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (167 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Holden FB Special. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Holden FB Special.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Holden FB Special 1981 Mazda Cosmo
Make Holden Mazda
Model FB Special Cosmo
Year Released 1965 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 1970 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 167 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 3300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 1098 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2620 mm