1965 Holden FB Special vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden FB Special weights approximately 115 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1965 Holden FB Special is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden FB Special. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Holden FB Special (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Holden FB Special will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Holden FB Special | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FB Special | Clio |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1149 cc |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |
